Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 2121 - 2140 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]
Both the United States and Brazil have recently taken clear positions on the laws that regulate merchants charging different amounts for goods depending on the method of payment. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A USCIS officer could no longer deny L-1A classification to such a manager because they were not supported by personnel within the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983).[6] Blue Shield v. [read post]
The Court found that such enforcement would unconstitutionally expand Congress’s power under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution[v]. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
Before the 1909 proposal for a constitutional amendment, the Court ruled, in a series of decisions, in favor of certain excise taxes that allowed for the taxation of corporate income as the price of doing business in the  United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:51 pm by Jarod Bona
Antitrust doctrine in the United States and throughout the world is constantly adjusting to both economic and academic developments. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
 First, Section 602(a) of Title 17 of the United States Code states that importation of copyrighted works obtained outside the United States without the authorization of the US copyright holder is infringement under section 106. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]