Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 2121 - 2140 of 9,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States, the Court held that new Fourth Amendment precedent must apply retroactively. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Robert L. Abell
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On 7 July 2020, the same judge handed down judgment in the case of United Kingdom Independence Party Ltd (UKIP) v Braine & Ors [2020] EWHC 1794 (QB) As already mentioned, the trial in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers began before Nicol J on Tuesday 7 July 2020 and continued until Friday 10 July 2020 when it was adjourned part heard. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm by Adam Feldman
And prior to this year, the court’s last signed decision in July was United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
Seattle (2007) (severely limiting affirmative action programs in primary and secondary schools); Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:06 pm by Josh Blackman
The United States Attorney, George Hay, would only offer to provide a redacted copy of the letter, with certain portions excluded. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Peter Shane
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
They compared it to Clinton administration Solicitor General Drew Days’ famous mistake in United States v. [read post]