Search for: "Reiter v. Reiter" Results 2121 - 2140 of 6,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The judge reviewed the national case law on selections/deletions from multiple lists (Merck v Shionogi [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), Nokia v IPCom [2012] EWCA Civ 567 and GlaxoSmithKline v Wyeth [2016] EWHC 1045 (Pat)) and the EPO cases reviewed therein and in the EPO Case Law Book. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am by Madelaine Lane
On November 30, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court reinstated, Duncan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
This question arises because according to the referring court, the to be trade marked shape consists of three essential features, two of which are technically necessary and one of which results exclusively from the nature of the goods themselves:the basic rectangular slab shape: results from the nature of the goods (Article 3(1)(e)(i)),the presence, position and depth of the grooves running along the length of the bar: necessary to obtain technical result (Article 3(1)(e)(ii)),  the number of… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Court reiterated the importance of freedom of expression for democracies, but emphasised the need to correctly balance that freedom with the protection of private life. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 11:47 am by Helen Klein
And his intense probing of both the government’s reading of Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:37 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphases added)Between that sensible holding, a subsequent occasion on which he reiterated that view, and the Unwired Planet v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 12:44 am
Cos., 11 AD3d 595; Prus v Glencott Realty Corp., 10 AD3d 390)", the Second Department reiterated that "an insurer waives any ground for denying coverage that is not specifically asserted in its notice of disclaimer, even if that ground would otherwise have merit[.] [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed – first reiterating its prior statement in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]