Search for: "Sharp v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 12:27 pm
While Golden State voters were giving Sec. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
The Administration is committed to promoting nuclear power in the United States and developing a safe, long-term solution for the management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:54 pm
However, in 2005, in Illinois v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
” New York v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
The most interesting recent development is in the Sharp v Oppo case, where the Chinese courts confirmed for the first time that they do have jurisdiction to set global licensing terms. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am
The court denied the respondents’ dismissal motion, finding a “sharp dispute” as to the petitioner’s stockholder status. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:14 pm
In a unanimous decision authored by Sharpe J.A. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 9:22 am
Thus, in Bradbury v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Schleicher v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm
” Apache Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
The case, Dillon v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Watch for the decision in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
