Search for: "Small v. People" Results 2121 - 2140 of 7,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
 This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
People who don't know about this will look at Apple's presentation and will be in awe of this incredible example of American inventiveness -- when in reality a small Swedish company had made slide-to-unlock available to customers before the iPhone and before Apple filed its patent. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
The opposing people put up by the second defendant are two company liquidators, Mr Olde and Mr Landrey. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am by Bill Marler
Over the last week I spoke to two families of very young children stricken by E. coli O111 after they both attended a small town Maine fair and petting zoo. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
As we noted before, such compliance can be burdensome, and perhaps unduly burdensome, for small companies, whether small retailers or small platforms. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:07 am by Joe Palazzolo
U.S. (11-199) and Reichle v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
In particular, that serious harm can be inferred, even in cases of relatively small circulation, if the defamatory words are serious. [read post]