Search for: "Smith v. SMITH"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 16,211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Lifestyle Equities CV v The Copyrights Group Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1212 (Ch) (10 May 2021)This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off, The first claimant was the registered proprietor of the following European Union and United Kingdom trade marks and the second claimant was its exclusive licensee:EU005482484 [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
Zupnik v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
And although there has been significant clamor among conservatives to overrule Smith (including three justices expressly endorsing such a move in June’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Smith, 618 F. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Smith, 618 F. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
And over the decades that followed, in cases that include Muskrat v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 11:27 am
Smith; and former vice-chief Jay Moore. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:42 am
On July 16, in Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:54 am
Smith; dissent by Steele). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:46 am
Smith, 152 Ill. 2d 229, 263 (1992). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
In Screws v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:15 pm
Smith and Nephew ruling, among other announcements. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:15 pm
Smith and Nephew ruling, among other announcements. [read post]
