Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Richard Hasen worries that in North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case Rucho v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Garrett, 2000’s United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:34 pm
Sandford - questions never raised, never briefed, not germane and contrary to common belief at the time - was that Congress could not regulate slavery in federal territories and that no person of African descent could be a citizen of the United States or any state therein.So, in 1856, four years before South Carolina would secede from the Union ultimately bringing Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Georgia, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
The term “Alford plea” originated with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
ACLU of North Carolina, 14-35, both ask whether messages on state-issued specialty plates qualify as government speech and are immune from any requirement of viewpoint neutrality. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
For example, in its North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
In North Carolina, at least 26 current death row defendants were sentenced by all-white juries. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court cases: Meyer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
As an immediate result of the act, hundreds of men were indicted in North Carolina, while United States Attorney G. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:55 pm
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
