Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 32,527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
On November 28, 2018, oral argument was heard in Tyson Tibbs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Ct., Nov. 39, 2917), a Pennsylvania state appeals court rejected an inmate's claim that the sex offender treatment program required for parole forces him to admit guilt in violation of his religious convictions by forcing him to bear false witness against himself.In Riddick v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
One year earlier, in Alexander v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:15 pm
Coast Guard published an interim rule [78 FR 13481-13493] with a request for comments to conform regulations to the adopted MARPOL Annex V amendments which entered into force on January 1, 2013. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:24 pm
The recent Sixth Circuit case of McKelvey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:22 am
The Court of Appeals reverses because the district court had no jurisdiction over the state law claim.The case is Carver v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am
In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 7:25 am
The state argues the retaliation verdict is bad because it conflicts with the excessive force verdict. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:55 pm
Ahmad Edwards v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
Last week’s Federal Circuit decision, Blueport Co., LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
In Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:16 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently announced its ruling in the Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
However, this is not sufficient to prevent future investor-state arbitration challenges – as it will not affect the huge amount of BITs already in force between UPCA Members and third states. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:43 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:45 pm
It just may force a bit of change, too. [read post]
