Search for: "State v. Johnson" Results 2121 - 2140 of 8,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Johnson v City of Mount Vernon 2023 NY Slip Op 01502 Decided on March 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Johnson v City of Mount Vernon 2023 NY Slip Op 01502 Decided on March 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson, the Satanic Temple of Washington tried to wrest control of its Facebook page from a competing faction. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
Johnson, 63 Ohio App.3d 345, 347-348, 578 N.E.2d 867 (9th Dist.1989), citing United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
The State of Texas v. $281,420.00, No. 08-0465. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Until that day comes, the exclusionary rule should be limited to bad-faith violations.The high court also took up Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:07 pm
  A panel of the Ninth Circuit in Miranda B. adopted a particular standard on this issue by quoting from a purported en banc opinion written by Chief Judge Kozinski, with a citation to "United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]