Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
The House of Lords decision in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by John O'Sullivan
So says the Court of Appeal in its reasons for decision in Biancaniello v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm by Rachit Buch
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This approach has been endorsed and adopted in the recent case National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon, Anatolie Stati and others. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:55 am by Vikram Raghavan
State of Bihar be shapeless, formless like Agni or Vayu , or even a simple piece of wood. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:50 am by Angus McCullough QC
More secret justice on the horizon Angus McCullough QC special advocate for Russian cleared of spying in deportation case Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals annoucement on new COVID-19 restrictions for England (1 November 2020). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
Are the famous words of Lord Hoffman in Kirin-Amgen that "life is too short" to consider the file, soon to ring hollow? [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
As for the material content of the rule, the House of Lords has explained as follows:‘But Henderson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm by Mathews P. George
I shall argue in affirmative relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Pepperall J handed down judgement in the defamation claim of Vince v Lord Bailey of Paddington [2025] EWHC 287 (KB). [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Justice Maurice Kay accepted that “the context – the protection of vulnerable children – is important and, together with a degree of urgency may impact on the requirement of procedural fairness“. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Scotch Whisky Association & Ors v the Lord Advocate & Anor (Scotland), heard 24-25 Jul 2017. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
  [1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25… [read post]