Search for: "State v. M. V." Results 2121 - 2140 of 29,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Even so, the admittedly fuzzy distinction between direct and indirect injuries gets at the limitation I'm describing, which might also be analogized to proximate cause.Some version of that idea--either the direct/indirect distinction or the notion of proximate cause--helps explain why rejecting standing for Missouri even if it stands in the shoes of MOHELA is consistent with the standing analysis in Dep't of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:09 am by Russell Knight
[M]ost states…mandate[] that custody determinations be made in the best interests of the children involved. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am by Stewart Baker
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by Unknown
Instead, plaintiff relied on three other connections to Oregon: Sivers’ father was located in Oregon and facilitated the investment as the agent of Sivers; Sivers intended to invest in Oregon companies; and the notes themselves contemplate existence in Oregon.The plaintiff relied on State v. [read post]