Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Turek v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
See Nigra v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
By Eric Goldman Trout Point Lodge, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
Maine, which held that states are immune from private suits filed in state courts for damages brought under Section 16(b) of the FLSA. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:44 am
In Maine, where the Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently weighed the case of Estate of Gagnon v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
The Court also stated that features that have been modified by FN Herstal to provide them with additional technical functions cannot be considered “copied” either, and in any event not “slavishly”. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
The DSM Directive provides a current example of this: its provisions are so complex that in essence the “battlefield” has moved from Strasbourg and Brussels to the Member States that will need to transpose the directive.Sophie then asked the panel a recap of the 3 best and worst contributions by the CJEU.The best 3 contributions of the CJEU according to Eleonora were:The dialogue between the CJEU and the national courts, which at times has been unavoidable (eg where the language… [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Lancaster, Jr., of Portland, Maine, recommended on April 16 that the Court rule that the two states must share regulatory authority over at least parts of the planned project. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Stroup v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:49 am
She walked up Main Street and then started crossing at an intersection. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:39 am
Additional Resources: Cromer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
To briefly recap, the main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:02 am
The case is styled, Joan Elaine Murray v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
Canada, and Bridgestone v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 1:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
