Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jeremy Phillips at The IPKat hosted Blawg Review on the tenth World Intellectual Property Day. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jeremy Phillips at The IPKat hosted Blawg Review on the tenth World Intellectual Property Day. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc., 529 F.3d 1364, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
" Phillips v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In considering the meaning of “harassment”, Rix LJ drew upon the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v News Group Newspapers where Lord Phillips defined harassment as: “conduct targeted at an individual which is calculated to produce the consequences described in section 7 and which is oppressive and unreasonable”. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
Phillips, who often epresents the Chamber, has said that “except for the solicitor general representing the United States, no single entity has more influence on what cases the Supreme Court decides and how it decides them than the [Chamber’s] National Chamber Litigation Center. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon, 568 N.Y.S.2d 84, 85 (N. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:04 pm
House Bill 3073, if it becomes law, will overturn Michael v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
For more information, please contact Naomi Feinstein (feinsteinn@gtmlaw.com), Russell Lamb (lambru@gtmlaw.com) or Sarah Phillips (phillipss@gtmlaw.com). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 671-72 (1950)); see also Speedco, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See our recent post on Lord Phillips’ lecture. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:31 am
In its opinion in Luce v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
Phillip J. [read post]
