Search for: "State v. Twist"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 2:21 am
Wallace concurred, stating though that a modified categorical approach should be used.US v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:00 am
At the time of her sublease request, tenant had resided in the former loft premises for 25 years and had regularly filed New York State income tax returns listing the premises as her address. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:10 am
The Appellate Division, First Department, doesn't think so.In Litwack v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:03 pm
The decision is US v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
The majority also cited Schering v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:33 pm
Class II drugs are reported to the state (which, last time I looked, is NOT the federales). [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:18 am
This seems twisted. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:33 pm
Those in the patent realm remember the case of the University of Rochester v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 3:28 pm
State. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:12 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
The Tony Twist case, Doe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
What I said: The interesting twist here came during the defense attorney's cross examination of [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
L.P. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
