Search for: "State v. W. B."
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Notwithstanding the absence of language in the stipulation as to the parties’ obligation to provide for Kenneth’s college education expenses and the fact that he has attained the age of 21 and payment for such expenses is not required by statute (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b][b][2] ), such payment may be enjoined if special circumstances exist (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b][c][7]; see also, Hapeman v.… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
Specifically, the Circuit Court noted that “[w]hile we agree…that Pennsylvania law empowers a court to enjoin the threatened disclosure of trade secrets without requiring a plaintiff to show that disclosure is inevitable, we do not consider that an injunction granted absent such a showing was issued pursuant to the ‘inevitable disclosure doctrine’. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
Group W Productions, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
“The official language of the State of Illinois is English. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:18 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:51 am
I’ve always found it amazing that many U.S. state constitutions have similar provisions, and that a few people have been prosecuted for state treason. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 5:45 am
Cranfill, Judge.Representing Appellants Krenning: Larry B. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:15 pm
(And it stays there).United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
In reaching this conclusion, the CMCR cited Rule for Military Commission (RMC) 907(b)(1), which states that “a charge or specification shall be dismissed at any stage of the proceedings if . . . [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:39 am
Maatman, Jr. and Alex W. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
WILLIAM B. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:07 am
In Forby, the district court found that: [w]hile . . . [read post]
