Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
According to the Census Bureau, there are fewer than 100 people with the last name of Travolta in the entire United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
Muskat v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:03 pm
In Glossip v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
[P]laintiff must point to a statute or judicial decision that clearly states such a strong public policy. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:45 am
The (unfortunately unpublished) decision of United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
This decision is notable for its application of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) pleading standard, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in BellAtlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Nellcor Puritan Bennett LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:45 am
Vladeck (Georgetown University Law Center and American University - Washington College of Law) have posted State Law, the Westfall Act, and the Nature of the Bivens Question after Minneci v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
This is one of the murkiest cases I’ve seen, but the brief is clear and strong. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
It was “geographically descriptive—a portmanteau of the names of the two states on whose border the plaintiffs’ establishment sits,” but also commercially strong in pointing specifically to plaintiffs, at least before the MTV show. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm
That argument met with strong resistance from three justices who came to the Supreme Court from the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:39 am
Magee v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:36 am
SnapPower v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm
When the court on Tuesday took up the high-profile case of Gill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
Where the parties have agreed to provide for a child beyond what is legally required, courts must “giv[e] due weight to the strong public policy favoring stability of [consensual] arrangements[,]” Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
