Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
Notwithstanding the modesty of these proposals, at least some conservative legal scholars have argued that they’d be unconstitutional, pointing to Justice Antonin Scalia’s celebrated dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm
Hamburger insists otherwise, alluding to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:49 am
” Whereas, in the case of large-scale infringement “a person may be convicted of gross copyright infringement or gross trademark infringement and sent to prison for at least six months and not more than six years”. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
This is not intended to be a full-scale review of a long, complex, and nuanced book. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm
(Hayes v Willoughby [2013] 1 WLR 935). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Justify v. specify: lawyers deal with specification. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
On April 5th Ecuadorian police scaled the walls of the Mexican embassy (pictured) in Quito, Ecuador’s capital. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
., ¶30 iii - v). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
None of this would have occurred but for the 2013 Snowden revelations of the scale of GCHQ’s use of bulk interception powers. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
None of this would have occurred but for the 2013 Snowden revelations of the scale of GCHQ’s use of bulk interception powers. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
v=kcCObU0pIp8.This week, China's future global dominance was on full display as foreign leaders headed to Beijing in the hope of securing lucrative projects as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:59 am
People tend to agree to any terms provided—need to know more about this. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
Finally, Internet companies aren’t “infringing on people’s right to speak. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
People must also be able to find and effectively use these sites to build legal capacity, Hagan writes. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
