Search for: "U.S. v. Promin" Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Randy Barnett  and Keith Whittington  have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:45 am
If the court required "prominence" as a condition of enforcing the agreement, the requirement would plainly violate the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan II - then an Assistant U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 But the pendulum swung back in favor of good faith purchasers in January 2010, when the Ninth Circuit in Von Saher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:32 am by Orin Kerr
., Raich, 545 U.S. at 30 (rejecting the argument that plaintiffs’ home– grown marijuana was “entirely separated from the market”); Wickard, 317 U.S. at 127, 128 (home-grown wheat “competes with wheat in commerce” and “may forestall resort to the market”); Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:10 am by David Canton
That was based on the notion the matters that the alleged defamation referred to took place in the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
In assessing fairness, the court noted that even though there might be difficulties with enforcement of a judgment in the U.S., a favourable ruling would have some value in vindication for Black. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm by David Lat
The case that was just granted cert is captioned Stern v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am by lawmrh
” Statistics from the Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  But yesterday’s split decision, which appeared in today’s Daily Journal update, involved one of the most prominent military justice cases of the 21st Century:  United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm by Morris Turek
  Unquestionably, BLIZZARD is an arbitrary and famous trademark entitled to the broadest scope of protection under U.S. trademark law. [read post]