Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 7:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
It is for us too. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:38 pm
TransFresh Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
And the notary tells us that the signatures are genuine. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
” He further noted that “Congress has continued to exercise oversight of the Judiciary’s operations, promoting a useful dialogue characterized by mutual respect in matters of administration. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am
’” In an op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle (subscription or registration required), Bob Egelko compares Justice Clarence Thomas’s comments in his concurring opinion in the Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
Thus, it is critical that any CCOPS ordinance apply not just to proposals for new surveillance tech, but also to the continued use of existing surveillance tech.For example, city agencies in Davis that possessed or used surveillance technology when that city’s CCOPS ordinance went into effect had a four-month deadline to submit a proposed privacy policy. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
At the UC Davis Law Review Online, Chad Flanders assesses the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
US, concerning the constitutionality of the immigration law passed in Arizona in 2010. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am
” Briefly: At the Human Rights at Home Blog, Martha Davis looks at the first wave of briefs filed in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:35 pm
Davis. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
If the statute turned out to be a disaster, the legislature might evade responsibility by saying something like (my words, not Justice Liu’s): “But you voters approved (or told us to do) this, so you can’t now blame us! [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
Davis. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:44 am
The argument was based, in significant part, on the Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. [read post]
