Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 9,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 3:14 pm
The plaintiff in McColgan v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:14 pm
The plaintiff in McColgan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
In Jenkin v Cadore, 2020 NY Slip Op 03649 Decided on July 1, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department, one important issue is that Plaintiffs did not use an expert affidavit in opposition to summary judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:10 pm
” City of Atascadero v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:53 am
The FSA's paper mostly uses the term "patent pool" and makes a few references, mostly when quoting other documents, to "licensing platforms. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
LaBarge v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’… [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
What is the greatest challenge in relation to AI at a worldwide level? [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Royal, 875 F.3d at 907 n.5 (collecting state cases); see also US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
” Also at Law360, Ryan Davis reports that another of the newly granted cases, Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:25 pm
Comment This decision is a useful reminder of the principles applicable to the assessment of damages, and a good indicator of the level of damages which one can expect to recover in relation to serious allegations published to a small overall readership. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:42 pm
Courthouse Kiyemba v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:03 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
LengeDocket: 10-795Issue(s): Whether Connecticut's campaign finance law discriminates against minor-party candidates by imposing onerous qualifying requirements and including a trigger provision that provides a major-party opponent with an offsetting grant when a minor party opponent reaches a threshold level of contributions.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondents Albert P. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 11:22 am
That’s the question which the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to answer in the closing days of their September term, allowing a petition for leave to appeal in Barr v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Last month the Supreme Court delivered judgment in AP v DPP [2011] IESC 2, which concerned an appeal against the High Court’s refusal to grant an order prohibiting a fourth trial of the applicant. [read post]
