Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit" Results 2121 - 2140 of 6,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Following a ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that there was no federal jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims, his case was remanded back to Pennsylvania state court. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:57 am by Bob Eisenbach
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second court of appeals to answer the question left open in the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal of a lawsuit filed by an undocumented worker against his former employer’s attorney. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm by John Ross
He appeals on statutory grounds and also pleads equitable estoppel. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit has held, or under clear-error review, as the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Ninth Circuit approach is supported by most (but not all) of the statements the Supreme Court has made on the topic, but candor compels the acknowledgement that the law in this area is not really settled and could definitely benefit from high Court attention and clarification. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:18 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  On January 9, 2019, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in Seila Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The question presented is: When applying the Chandris 30-percent rule, may a court consider the time a maritime worker spends in the service of a vessel in navigation that is moored, dockside, or ashore, as the Third, Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits have held, or must a court categorically exclude such time, as the Eleventh Circuit and the Maryland Court of Appeals have held? [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:51 pm
According to the Associated Press, the United States Supreme Court rejected T-Mobile's appeal in three related cases. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
Finding clear legal error in a district court’s conclusion that the government informant privilege did not apply to 250 anonymous state employees because they provided statements to the United States Department of Labor (DOL) after it filed an FLSA suit against their state agency employer, the Ninth Circuit granted the DOL’s petition for a writ of mandamus and ordered the lower court to enter a protective order.… [read post]
  A year after the California Supreme Court decided Iskanian, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also held in a 2-1 split decision in Sakkab v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 am by Jeffrey Brown
Monzel, 2011 WL 3055311 (2011) (an appeal from United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:23 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, decided SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]