Search for: "United States v. Fields" Results 2121 - 2140 of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 8:28 am by Rick Hasen
The United States is one of the few mature democracies that leaves the rules for counting elections in local hands, and, in a majority of states, that means partisan officials are in charge. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
Because the "Supremacy Clause" of the United States Constitution says so: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land . . . . [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
This article analyzes the current fluctuations within the field of process patents, a result of two major Supreme Court decisions (Bilski v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 10:44 am by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:46 am by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
We have field agents out currently gathering information and planning the attack. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
The United States Supreme Court stated in 1990 that the state has "a grave and legitimate interest" in stopping drunk drivers. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
In 1948, Murray published their first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, a 700-hundred-page analysis and critique of segregation in the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
In a second patent case closely watched by specialists in the field, Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
Wright II said the United States is excluded from the operation of such state laws because of its sovereign immunity and ruled that the statutory deadlines are not binding on CMS. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:47 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  The Army and Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual explicitly cautions that “[P]articipation in COIN operations by U.S. forces must follow United States law, including domestic laws, treaties to which the United States is party, and certain [host nation] laws. . . . [read post]