Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 6,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 8:35 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
Bethune-Hill; and a reviewability of agency decision case, Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
The voters got to decide.But in 1988, after 150 years of things working out just fine relying on the voters, the Legislature decided to limit who could become a County Sheriff, and imposed some minimal qualifications for the office.The Court of Appeal upholds those limitations. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Those lost clients are the majority of the population, who are the majority of taxpayers, and also the majority of voters. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Because of my pro-copyright positions in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
Even as the right to safe, legal abortion recognized in Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
In Vieth v Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267 (2004), a plurality of the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:08 pm
Election Infrastructure | In EPIC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:26 am
The events giving rise to Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
In Bellotti, the Supreme Court held unconstitutional a Massachusetts law that barred corporations from spending funds to influence or affect a vote on questions submitted to voters that do not materially affect the company's business, property, or assets; the law also said individual income tax items were not material to corporations (the law was enacted in the context of an effort to amend the state’s constitution to impose a graduated income tax on individuals). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:04 am
Bullock, the court, with the chief in the majority, summarily overturned a Montana Supreme Court decision that had sought to distinguish a 1912 voter-approved state ban of corporate contributions from the federal restriction at issue in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
Our Fort Lauderdale personal injury lawyers at The Ansara Law Firm noted as much when the Florida Supreme Court said as much in 2017 when in North Broward Hospital District v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
” Hirabayashi v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:12 pm
As a result, he argues that the Duren v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am
In Gray v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:18 am
The case is North Carolina NAACP v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am
That’s the kind of scenario California voters wanted to remedy. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
