Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 66,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court can be expected to address how its Wal-Mart and Comcast decisions–both arising under Rule 23–apply to FLSA collective actions as well as state law wage and hour class actions. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
But, they may well feature, either implicitly or explicitly, in the court’s judgment. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:37 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:01 am
As in Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:52 am
If Missouri no longer captures the political economy of U.S. federal-state relations, however, as I argue in my submission to the symposium, we might do well to reconsider that traditional conception of international law as a threat to state authority, and federalism more broadly. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
” Oh well. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
One example of this was the well publicized case of UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:27 pm
Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
26 Aug 2004, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
A visitor to this site has asked about the results of a hearing involving a refund claim on out-of- state printing, adding “This could affect many more businesses who have not paid sales tax as well as those who have paid sales tax. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 5:47 am
Professor Katyal is well known to military justice practitioners as the result of both his stellar argument in Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:47 am
State of New York, 60 NY2d 742 [1983]) [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
Part V concludes that many other states in Asia already or potentially negotiating treaties with Australia – including Japan and China – are also unlikely to achieve a relaxation of the policy stance. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
As readers of this blog and followers of the actions of the Enron Task Force well know, this statute was a favorite weapon of the Enron Task Force and a favorite grounds for vacating convictions by the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am
For example, in Livingston v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
It doesn't bode well for you when the very first paragraph of the Court of Appeal's factual statement includes the following two sentences: "[Plaintiff] has filed in excess of 400 such actions in state and federal court, and has been declared a vexatious litigant in both jurisdictions. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:22 am
Hillcrest Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
