Search for: "York v. Texas" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2014, 9:19 pm
The case was transferred to the district court [of the Southern District of California] from the Eastern District of Texas [....] [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Texas is also on the court’s capital docket. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the split among lower courts regarding the proper interpretation of Graham v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Properly crafted anti-libel injunctions are often necessary If a plaintiff is libeled by the New York Times, damages might be a tolerable remedy. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by Eoin Daly
More recently, in Van Orden v Perry [2005], a narrow conservative majority of the Supreme Court held that the display of the ten commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol did not violate the establishment clause, primarily on the basis of the historical, secular significance of the Ten Commandments in the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
March 18, 3:40-4:30 PM, America's Health Insurance Plans, National Health Policy Conference: Panel on "Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am by Andrew R. Boortz
Thus, courts in California, Texas, or even other parts of New York can disagree with Judge Weinstein's findings. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am by Andrew R. Boortz
Thus, courts in California, Texas, or even other parts of New York can disagree with Judge Weinstein's findings. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am by Andrew R. Boortz
Thus, courts in California, Texas, or even other parts of New York can disagree with Judge Weinstein's findings. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am by Andrew R. Boortz
Thus, courts in California, Texas, or even other parts of New York can disagree with Judge Weinstein's findings. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Aug. 12, 2009) the court held that a contract containing a choice of law and forum clause effectively waives the right to remove to federal court under the New York Convention. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
  In an op-ed for the New York Times, Paul Sherman discusses Bluman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News   No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times   One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am by Josh Bell
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Board of Education of the City of New York, 14-354, which was relisted a third time this week. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
‎ [6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. [7] Rutledge… [read post]