Search for: "A. Jackson"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 27,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
Justice Jackson briefly noted that she wouldn’t have vacated the lower court ruling but didn’t disagree with the conclusion that there’s nothing left to decide, in light of the ending of the COVID emergency and the Title 42 policy.Justice Gorsuch added a “statement. [read post]
21 May 2023, 7:05 pm
“Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to 2023 BU LAW Graduates: ‘Anything Is Possible’; The associate justice shared lessons learned through her career—and her love of musical theater. [read post]
21 May 2023, 4:55 pm
Jackson said she has seen every episode since the show’s second season. [read post]
20 May 2023, 2:23 pm
The post “Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson tells law students ‘Survivor’ offers helpful lessons” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
20 May 2023, 2:49 am
Originally titled "Bill Bailey, Won't You Please Come Home," it was written in 1902 by Hughie Cannon, a tavern piano player in Jackson, Michigan. [read post]
20 May 2023, 1:17 am
Originally titled "Bill Bailey Won't You Please Come Home," it was written in 1902 by Hughie Cannon, a tavern piano player in Jackson, Michigan. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:26 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court; Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a concurring opinion, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:46 pm
Now that role falls to (checks notes) Gorsuch and Jackson? [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm
In a particularly unusual line-up, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for a majority of seven; Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, agreed with her opinion and wrote a brief separate opinion. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:30 am
”[6] A concurrence written by Justice Neil Gorsuch (joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson) further argued that the subsequent use (AWF’s licensing to Condé Nast) is the relevant inquiry rather than considering the original copier’s (Andy Warhol) intent in creating the “Orange Prince. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:54 am
The Supreme Court’s big case on Section 230, Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:01 am
“Both cases came to this Court at the motion-to-dismiss stage, with no factual record,” Justice Jackson wrote. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
The partial concurrence/partial dissent of CJ Roberts (which was joined by Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, and Jackson) is pretty persuasive in its characterization of some of those prior cases as really about balancing regardless of discrimination.Accordingly, Justice Gorsuch's approach should be understood as not merely a recharacterization of the Court's precedent but in some sense as a break. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Democratic appointees Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan as well as Republican appointees Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett each joined parts of Justice Gorsuch’s opinion, while the principal dissent by Republican appointee Chief Justice John Roberts was joined by his fellow Republican appointees Justices Samuel Alito and Kavanaugh, as well as by Democratic appointee Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 pm
Justice Jackson filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the court’s decision to vacate the D.C. [read post]
18 May 2023, 2:28 pm
Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers in setting up appropriate employment verification policies, conducting internal compliance audits, and training staff. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Today was the 2023 Super Bowl of Internet Law at the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2023, 11:18 am
As reported by News4SanAntonio.com, “[t]he incident happened around 1:30 a.m. at the Privat Social Club off UTSA Boulevard and Vance Jackson Road. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:15 am
Justices Gorsuch and Jackson authored a concurrence, while Justice Kagan, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, filed a 35-page dissent from Justice Sotomayor’s opinion, calling out the majority’s contradictory interpretation of similar facts in the recent Google v. [read post]
