Search for: "ADAMS v. STATE" Results 2141 - 2160 of 5,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Peter Hirtle
  First, the MHS stated that the “letters, reports of committees, polemical writings, & state papers of John Adams” were preexisting, and the basis of its copyright claim was therefore only in the new matter: the compilation, editing, and introductory materials. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), Bob Egelko reports on Sessions v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the challengers in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg examines the petitioner’s free-speech arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am by Walter Olson
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck discusses Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm by Thomas Hopson
Hagen dealt with allegations of excessive force and unreasonable seizure by a state trooper, while addressed a retaliatory-use-of-force claim and Ghost Bear v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Their Honours held that the defence should not be unduly restricted, and that even statements that are not central to the matter communicated may still be relevant and protected, as was the case in Adam v Ward. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:32 am by Will Baude
Adam Winkler discusses the scenario in the New Republic (and seems to think that the consequences of doing so would be quite bad). [read post]