Search for: "Adams v State"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 5,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
It states: Sec. 51.016. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Next is Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am
The Opinion is adamant that neither Article 17 of the Design Directive nor Article 96(2) of the Design Regulation question that this possibility is precluded:Those provisions therefore lay down not a principle of general scope governing the protection of works of applied art in EU copyright law, but a rule for overlapping protection regimes confined to the substantive scope of the acts concerned, namely the subject matter protected as designs under those acts.The InfoSoc Directive preempts… [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
A recent federal court case, Adams v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:35 am
In this case, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:25 am
”For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter For more on state-sponsored malware:https://www.eff.org/issues/state-sponsored-malware Contact: KarenGulloAnalyst, Senior Media Relations Specialistkaren@eff.org [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:23 pm
The second case, Texas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
Their Honours held that the defence should not be unduly restricted, and that even statements that are not central to the matter communicated may still be relevant and protected, as was the case in Adam v Ward. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Hagen dealt with allegations of excessive force and unreasonable seizure by a state trooper, while addressed a retaliatory-use-of-force claim and Ghost Bear v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
