Search for: "BELL v. BELL" Results 2141 - 2160 of 5,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2018, 12:04 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The Sept. 19 majority decision by CMAC Justices Jocelyne Gagne and Vital Ouellette (Chief Justice Richard Bell dissented) ruled that to deprive a military accused of a trial by jury for offences punishable by more than five years in prison, and that were committed within Canada, is not justified under s. 1 of the Charter as a reasonable and demonstrably justified limit in a free and democratic society: R. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
I send thanks to Attorney Timothy Knowles of the Blue Bell, PA law firm of Warren & McGraw, LLC for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by Walter Olson
[Michigan Health Law Link] Tags: discrimination law, medical, Michigan Related posts Update: McLeod v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by Kris Miccio
The case of Buck v Bell stains not only the early history of Progressives, adherents to eugenics, but the legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes who opined, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough,” as he upheld the forced sterilization of women. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 12:04 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The Sept. 19 majority decision by CMAC Justices Jocelyne Gagne and Vital Ouellette (Chief Justice Richard Bell dissented) ruled that to deprive a military accused of a trial by jury for offences punishable by more than five years in prison, and that were committed within Canada, is not justified under s. 1 of the Charter as a reasonable and demonstrably justified limit in a free and democratic society: R. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:11 am by John Day
   The case is Estate of Bell v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 pm by Daniel Margolin
  The court of appeals ruled on this issue on December 1, 2010 in the Bell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations, or... [read post]
7 May 2007, 4:14 am
In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 783, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1530 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm by Venkat
University of MinnesotaSuspension for Facebook/YouTube Rap Video Critical of High School Coach Does not Violate First Amendment – Bell v. [read post]