Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 7,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
(Williams v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:39 am
Two of the cases – Sebelius v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:11 pm
In a pair of decisions in Porter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Leon, which is the case that gave birth to the good faith exception. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:32 am
Supreme Court majority that’s not a friend to Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:29 am
Folk v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
See Bader v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
Lesmes did not deny that M.A.Y. habitually resided in Colombia from her birth through November of 2015. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
The child's birth certificate named Mark D. as the father. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
FEC, Burwell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In that case the House of Lords had unanimously concluded that Mrs Bellinger, a transsexual female who had been born and registered as a male at birth, could not validly contract a marriage with another male. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:09 am
Oregon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:59 pm
Bayer Schering v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
A decade ago, in Nguyen v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:57 am
Burke.The case, R. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:47 am
The court followed the 1999 New Mexico Supreme Court case of Torres v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Considering the issue, the court noted that in Coleman v Court of Appeals of Maryland, the Supreme Court distinguished the “self-care” provision concerning an employee’s own serious health condition from the “family-care” provisions, which concern the birth, adoption, foster care of a child, or the caring of a covered family member who has a serious health condition. [read post]
