Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 2141 - 2160 of 8,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm by Marcia Coyle
" The political question doctrine frequently has figured in cases involving the foreign policy interests of the United States and the Justices have not been reluctant to defer to the executive branch in those situations. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:04 am by Amy Howe
On March 4, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm by Lisa Heinzerling
What emerges from all this is a vision of Congress, the executive branch, the courts and the states working together to protect the waters of the United States while keeping the program within manageable bounds. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:10 pm by Michael DeRose
He claimed he can return to employment in a different (non-judicial) branch of State government, and that there is nothing in the settlement agreement “to say that he couldn’t return to his former duties with a different employer. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, the proclamation’s applicability only to non-visa-holders outside the United States puts it in the sweet spot of judicial deference to the political branches, as the Supreme Court showed in the travel ban case. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am by Elliot Setzer
(b) The suspension and limitation on entry pursuant to section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to: (i) any lawful permanent resident of the United States; (ii) any alien seeking to enter the United States on an immigrant visa as a physician, nurse, or other healthcare professional; to perform medical research or other research intended to combat the spread of COVID-19; or to perform work essential to combating, recovering from, or otherwise alleviating the effects of… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court” in McGirt v. [read post]