Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 4:14 am
As the California Attorney's Fees Bl;og reports, arbitration is the thing in California. [read post]
18 May 2008, 6:02 am
Located On: Jackson Lewis LLP Most Popular State Law Article California's Anti-SLAPP Law Protects Letter to Employer's Customers About Contemplated Trade Secrets Litigation. [read post]
14 May 2008, 12:25 pm
MoyleOn April 16, 2008, we posted information regarding Senate Bill 1539, which expressed the legislative intent to clarify the requirements of California law as they relate to employee meal periods. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:06 pm
In the California Employment Law Letter, there’s an article on the importance of taking whistleblowing seriously. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:52 am
Patty Murray and Edward Kennedy (PDF 38.4 KB) Letter Asks for an Investigation on Whether the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is Effectively Working to Ensure that Employers are Accurately Reporting Injuries and Illnesses in the Workplace04/22/2008
Letter to House Appropriations Chairman Dave Obey From Ranking Member Jerry Lewis (PDF 108 KB) Letter Expresses Opposition to the Consideration of the Supplemental Appropriations Bill… [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:21 pm
Carlton DiSante & Freudenberger's next monthly HR Roundtable, entitled Immigration Law Compliance--What Every Employer Should Know, will take place on April 15 from 8:00-9:00 a.m. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:09 pm
The California law goes further, forbidding inquiries about or discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or family status. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:31 pm
Letter of Donna M. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:48 am
Gabrielle is a 1982 graduate of the University of California, Davis, School of Law, and Mandana is a 1987 graduate of the University of San Francisco School of Law. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:07 am
More specifically, AFTRA’s letter asserts that Nick requires “that the performer grant to the employer a right to a ‘profit participation’ interest in the talent’s third-party income as a condition of employment” in violation of AFTRA’s collective bargaining agreement and possibly California law. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:07 am
More specifically, AFTRA’s letter asserts that Nick requires “that the performer grant to the employer a right to a ‘profit participation’ interest in the talent’s third-party income as a condition of employment” in violation of AFTRA’s collective bargaining agreement and possibly California law. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:12 am
Pot Clubs There Stirs a Budding Rebellion
The Recorder
When the Drug Enforcement Administration sent letters last year to California landlords reminding them it's a federal crime to rent to marijuana dispensaries, they opened another front in the battle to define how pot clubs operate in the hazy border between state and federal law. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
It created a form letter for consumers, and "[n]early 30 such confused customers signed such forms. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:19 am
But the California procedure has some features that arbitration does not. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:48 am
Employers in California are required to comply with the FLSA and California law and [...] [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:17 pm
A resume, cover letter, and writing sample are required along with three professional references, at least two of whom should be a law professor or previous employer. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:37 am
The Supreme Court found that because California and Delaware law have parallel continuous ownership requirements there is no conflict of law. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:55 am
Investors will examine the creation of IP very carefully in such a situation as they don't want to buy into a law suit. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
The court briefly looked at a number of Ninth Circuit cases - and one California state case -- holding that "wrongful discharge claims based on public policy violations are not preempted by federal labor laws (Saridakis v. [read post]
