Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
State, 113 S.W.3d 452 (Texas Court of Appeals 2003) (upon directing the technician to back up his files, the defendant `“no longer had a legitimate expectation of privacy in those files’). . . .State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:26 pm by John C. Manoog III
Other states with several highways listed include Illinois (the city of Chicago came in at #1), California, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Washington, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:03 pm by Michael Froomkin
California Teachers Association), to kill Obama’s immigration policy (United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 10:57 am by Leiza Dolghih
 The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently confirmed in Cardoni, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Yee, 15-169, involves the California Unclaimed Property Law. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The vote was a rare setback for LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) activists who had enjoyed recent success in both the legal and public opinion arenas, culminating in the June 28, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:26 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Self-driving Google car pulled over in California for going too slowlyAppeal court overturns lawyer's conviction for smuggling drugs into jailCop guilty of G20 assault won’t be fired — but he loses 5 days’ pay What Does It Really Mean to “Free the Law”? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
California – Tighter Rules for Lobbying Win S.F. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
 and overturn the Texas decision . . . [read post]