Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
The House of Lords in Erven Warnink v Townend provided a remedy of extended passing-off in order to prevent the defendant selling as "Old English Advocaat" a drink that may have been English but which was neither old nor advocaat. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
In eBay v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
In Opinion analysis: Justices reject publisher’s claims in gray-market copyright case, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 19, 2013, 12:22 PM), Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog nicely summarizes the ruling, in Plain English: In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am
In the United States, We the People are the sovereign. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
Unnamed Wallens Ridge State Prison Employees, 2012 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Cambridge English Dictionary. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm
Lydia Krebs and Samuel Schirer won in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
As a result, and as was the case in Elliott v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Mullo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
State of California (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 521, 550; see Kruger v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
He held that on the basis of binding English authority, the English legislative regime which permits the recovery of the additional liabilities is not incompatible with Article 10 of the Convention and that, in any event, MGN was not entitled to rely on any incompatibility. [read post]
