Search for: "Fields v. United States"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 5,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
United KingdomDirector of Public Prosecutions v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:20 pm
United States, the boundary of core tribal jurisdiction does not extend “beyond what is necessary to protect tribal self-government. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
Few books can get you from the rainy coast of Newfoundland over 19th-century Holstein straight to sunny Queensland and back to the North of Pennsylvania, while telling stories of a retired MI5 agent, the largest Ponzi scheme in history, a company founded by the 41st President of the United States, the aftermath of the First Gulf War, and the collapse of the Federal Bank of Australia. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
Most notably, Judge Bates wrote that suits against government officials in their official capacity amounted to suits against the United States and thus implicated the federal government’s sovereign immunity from suit. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
United States, 320 U. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:52 pm
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:16 pm
Under the recent United States Supreme Court case of Arizona v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
George v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:01 am
Brief for Petitioners, In re Serrone v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:04 pm
Rev. 1174 (2012) [PDF] Matthew Radler, Privacy Is the Problem: United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
(Here is audio of the September 9 argument in that campaign spending case, Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:22 am
Facts: This case (Monterey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
An empirical study of climate change litigation in the United States. 40 Envtl. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:51 am
She contended the initial stop violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm
As the United States pointed out at oral argument, any disruption or interference could be "catastrophic. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
