Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber) gave judgment today in Case C-580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg, an October 2013 reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesgerichtshof. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:36 am by Patrick Goold
Rub, Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal (forthcoming, 2015)In 2013, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In the wake of the David Petraeus scandal, in which the FBI gained back-end access to the gmail accounts of the CIA director's paramour, I ran across Google's semi-annual transparency statement, in which we learn that in the first six months of 2012, Google granted all or part of 90% of information requests from US law enforcement agencies, handing out information on 16,281 users in response to 7,969 requests.Comparing requests by country (Google provides only top-line national data, so we… [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
In 2009 a school student in Waltrop (within the Nord Rhine-Westphalia region of Germany) used the image in their presentation, which was subsequently posted on the school's website. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am by Florian Mueller
That is the question that, on the other side of the Pond, the Dusseldorf Regional Court referred to the European Court of Justice in Nokia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:46 am by Florian Mueller
I still believe that Microsoft is going to win the Google Maps case, and at today's IPCom v. [read post]
Related Issues: Mass Surveillance TechnologiesState Surveillance & Human RightsState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 11:57 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
Considered the “tip of the spear” of NATO’s Response Force (NRF), the VJTF currently includes forces from France, Germany, Poland, Spain, and Portugal. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Looking at the responses to botched executions in renaissance Germany, suggests Marshall may have been on to something. [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:28 am by Florian Mueller
Case law works has merely persuasive weight in Germany, so--unlike in Common Law jurisdictions--inconsistent decisions by the same court on the very same legal question would not be unheard of (no stare decisis doctrine). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:18 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:41 am
However, it has been argued that what Chinese patents lack in terms of quality can be made up by the huge numbers of filings that are happening.Once upon a time the spinning wheel was novelA transition to being the ‘good guys’In the recent case Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat) (see Katpost here) the Chinese company ZTE was sued by the US company Vringo for infringement of its patent. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:18 am by Florian Mueller
All of his is taking time, but those cases are pretty clearly going nowhere.Later this month a first hearing in a later-filed Munich Qualcomm v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers are surely aware, his fame extends well beyond the art world, given that Koons has contributed as litigant to some of the most interesting copyright case law around the world [see, eg, IPKat coverage here].A few days ago, it was the turn of the Italian Supreme Court to rule (decision 23935/2023 Koons v Garrone) in a case involving him and a copy of an artwork – specifically: a porcelain sculpture titled The Serpents – that he has refused to acknowledge as… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
Invalidity was sought on relative grounds under Article 8(1)(b) in combination with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009, the application being based on an International Registration for the word mark STAYER, having effect in Germany in respect of goods in classes 3, 8 and 16.The contested CTMThe Cancellation Division rejected the invalidity claim, finding that Zao Korporaciya had not shown genuine use of its own mark for the goods it had been registered, as requested by the CTM… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:06 am by Christine Corcos
In Kemmerer’s and Wohlleben’s Heidelberg encounter, from a Law& Literature perspective, Christa Wolf's Kassandra Project is explored as key to a differentiated understanding of Divided Germany in the final phase of the Cold War, of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the “Wende“, of 1989, and of subsequent political, social, legal and cultural transformations. [read post]