Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 3:02 pm
On May 18, 2011, the California Supreme Court granted review in Tien v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:34 pm
She maintains that the "neutral principles" approach of Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:30 am
App. 4th 1538 (March 23, 2010), when analyzing California law, where a State Court of Appeals declined to follow Dictiomatic, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Her hapless colleague in the Northern District of California, Judge Ronald M. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:37 pm
You know, the one who set up the A/V equipment and was a whiz-kid with all things computer related? [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
In the San Jose breathalyzer problem, the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer sometimes showed incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's error that can cause condensation to build up in the tube. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
In the San Jose breathalyzer problem, the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer sometimes showed incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's error that can cause condensation to build up in the tube. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest: Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm
" "Not so here," Kozinski wrote in Doody v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:46 pm
In fact, if I had written the ordinance, I'm not sure there would have even been as many as six exemptions... but I digress.At any rate, you can read the opinion here at Concerned Dog Owners of California, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In FCC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
– from Employment Law Worldview Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) Class Action Defense Cases–AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
Attorneys in Northern California, Hawaii, Eastern Washington and Montana. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
See, e.g., Imbler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
Gandhi R, Gandhi: The Man, his People, and the Empire (University of California Press, 2006). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
Bobby v. [read post]
