Search for: "Harrington" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2018, 5:58 pm by Stephen Page
For those of us who attended the national family law conference in Brisbane, there was an element of controversy between the Government and Opposition. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:27 pm
  To my great delight, I was asked to review Jan Broekman's brilliant new work, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Springer Nature, 2023). [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
  Legal Ethics   Professional Malpractice   Attorneys   Litigation Privilege   Anti-SLAPP Law   Illegal Attempts to Force into Settling   Extortion   “Flatley Rule. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
The commission is called to order with four defendants present (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa al Hawsawi) and one conspicuously absent (Walid bin Attash.) [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest          An article by Joel R. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by Edward Smith
Elk Grove Community Event Calendar I’m Ed Smith, an Elk Grove Personal Injury Lawyer. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Rejects Husbands Argument That Intention to Equally Divide  Marital Estate Was Frustrated Because Both Parties Operated under "Mistake" or Misconception as to Existence of a Legitimate Madoff Investment Account                                                                         … [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
By Adam Harrington Two people were left in critical condition early Friday when a wrong-way driver smashed into a car on the ramp from the Stevenson Expressway to Lake Shore Drive. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Hittson asks, among other things, “[w]hether the Eleventh Circuit has correctly determined that this Court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Rejects Husbands Argument That Intention to Equally Divide Marital Estate Was Frustrated Because Both Parties Operated under "Mistake" or Misconception as to Existence of a Legitimate Madoff Investment Account In Simkin v Blank, --- N.E.2d ----, 2012 WL 1080295 (N.Y.) [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
In a pair of much-noted decisions last March, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right of defendants to effective assistance of counsel is not limited to trial representation, but also extends to plea bargaining. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm by Michael O'Hear
In a pair of much-noted decisions last March, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right of defendants to effective assistance of counsel is not limited to trial representation, but also extends to plea bargaining. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
The Family Court recently ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for a child, J, aged 4, and that the father shall not spend time with the child or communicate with the child. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court Detention of D.F.F.: The Court held that the Superior Court Mental Proceeding Rule 1.3, which provides involuntary commitment proceedings “shall not be open to the public, unless the person who is the subject of the proceedings or his attorney files with the court a written request that the proceedings be public,” violates the right… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]