Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2141 - 2160
of 18,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
My concerns with Kelly v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
" The self-consciously textualist style of the majority--written by an outspokenly liberal Justice--underscores a point Justice Kagan made in 2015 when she said "we're all textualists now. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:38 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
Sellers in Tuesday’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Yesterday, in Lorenzo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
You’re saying there’s no substantive due process in the Constitution, so they’re just as wrong, according to your theory. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
The issues in Perry are extremely important, and they’re the kind of issues that force the Justices to fall back on first principles. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 2:29 pm
Justice Butz begins this published-today opinion by saying: "The storied history of mining in California has adverse consequences, among them the discharge of toxic residues from mining sites. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:07 am
We're done trying to figure out the true motivation behind your grants of review. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:41 am
Writes Amy Howe, with summaries of the 8 cases.We're just a few minutes away from the release of new opinions, which will be announced right away in the live-blogging at SCOTUSblog.UPDATE: Justice Gorsuch has the first opinion, in US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
Louisiana (07-1529) that tests whether the Justices will overrule Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
If you're interested, flip to the next page to see the juicy indictment. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
That was Justice Gorsuch for a 6 Justice majority today (including Chief Justice Roberts) in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
While we're at it, here's the TOC for JSCH 43:1:Chief Justice as Chief Executive: Taft's Judicial StatesmanshipKevin J. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
Under the questionable precedent in Geduldig v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Bivens v. [read post]
