Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
We're still dancing," (he said in an interview with the FT in July 2007). [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:45 am by Adrian Lurssen
We're frequently asked which Am Law firms use our service and so here (updated as we go) is the answer. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Puckett told the members that the evidence would show that the SEALs did something they’re trained to do — go to get someone and bring him back. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:55 pm by Margaret Taylor, Benjamin Wittes
Giuliani told the Times, We’re not meddling in an election, we’re meddling in an investigation, which we have a right to do…. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Either: (a) massive litigations will not be pursued because they're too complicated, uncertain, protracted, and expensive; and/or (b) if they must be pursued, contract attorneys, staff attorneys, and outsourcers will provide the human throw-weight needed for massive document review; and/or (c) corporations will simply insist that document review be completed for flat fees of $X/unit [$1.00/page? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
The judge seemed to be flying a kite here, since there was no suggestion that adultery – the subject matter of the particular case – may ever be re-criminalised. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
Courts go out of their way to characterize speech as commercial when they're going to find for the plaintiff.Without Central Hudson, all this is cast into doubt. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And New York Times v Sullivan (1964) overturned the Alabama Supreme Court's defamation decision against supporters of Martin Luther King, who placed an ad in the New York Times, limiting the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
"We're insulated from the French revolution going on now," says Steele, who like Strine is a Democrat. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Similarly, the leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to a good name at Irish law require fair procedures by public bodies (eg, In re Haughey [1971] IR 217; Shatter v Guerin [2019] IESC 9 (26 February 2019)); but, again, the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation context. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel One: User-generated Content, Digital Labor, and Collaborative AuthorshipModerator: Bethany RabeRebecca Tushnet: Fanworks, Fair Use, and Self-Actualization Through Transformative ExpressionTitle assigned a few months ago is a little misleading because I actually wanted to take the opportunity to talk about the Copyright Office’s recent report on moral rights, though I’m happy to talk about anything fanwork related during the panel discussion and Q&A. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  That may be “illegal” under the FDA’s constitutionally-suspect interpretation of the FDCA to ban off-label promotion categorically, but it’s damn hard to conceive of the distribution of peer-reviewed scientific articles as “false” in any sense that the First Amendment would recognize.We’re not the only ones with an eye open for promising First Amendment openings to challenge the FDA’s ban on truthful scientific speech whenever it… [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
If you think that some civil liability rule is unconstitutional, you can challenge it—but only as a defense when you're sued, not through a preenforcement challenge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 5:21 am
Again, the news here could be better if you're an existing Yahoo user. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm by admin
  A novel argument: We’re doing well with rotten boroughs, so they must be the cause! [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:33 am by Betty Lupinacci
I also sang one from a Marais and Miranda record about “Sitting in Jail” (“oh, it’s hard, hard when you’re sitting in jail”). [read post]