Search for: "Kelly v. State"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Dodds and Kellie R. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
Barnett v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:14 am
State & Richard Wallace v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:40 am
"Federal courts are expected to defer to state courts, when [in fact] the state court didn't have all the facts. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court today granting certiorari on the first issue in what is now called Bell v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:52 pm
Kelly (07-1223). [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:12 am
Kelly. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
See Hamilton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kelli Plump v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:50 am
Butler v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 12:35 am
In Nord v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Marvin Lee Kelly v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Kelly Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0200n.062008/04/16 Gant v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:04 am
[www.floridasupport.us]No. 07-7348 IN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EARL WESLEY BERRY, Petitioner V, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections,LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent ofthe Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman,and JOHN DOES 1-50, Respondents ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARITO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OFPETITION FOR A WRIT OF… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Contrary to the motion court's conclusion, plaintiffs cannot show that the defendants in the underlying action created the allegedly dangerous condition by an affirmative act of misfeasance (see Mercer v City of New York, 88 NY2d 955, 670 N.E.2d 443, 647 N.Y.S.2d 159 [1996]; Kelly v Berberich, 36 AD3d 475, 476-477, 828 N.Y.S.2d 332 [2007]), [**2] and the claim that said defendants failed to maintain the garage sign that was purportedly the instrumentality that… [read post]
