Search for: "King v. People" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:41 am by Elie Mystal
It’s a great f**king idea that you might want to do your school work yourself, since presumably you want to be an attorney when this is all over. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:57 pm
But we would be hard-pressed to top the tale of the 1632 King Gustav II Adolph gold ducat coin and its ultimate guardian, Stephanie Manning, the plaintiff in Manning v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
I find this area of the law fascinating, so much so that I am one of the very few people around who pay close attention to commercials on days other than Super Bowl Sunday. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
And we are aware that some academics have gone so far as to argue that a constitutional amendment adopted pursuant to Article V might be unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:07 am by John Inazu and Burt Neuborne
When the Supreme Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states in its unanimous 1937 decision, De Jonge v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
The term 'whip' according to him, has its origin to the whippers-in-people who keep the hounds in order at fox-hunting meets. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Both King Phillip II of Spain, the most powerful ruler in Europe, and Pope Pius V, head of the Catholic Church, actively worked to overthrow Elizabeth and replace her with a Catholic monarch. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
We are a nation of laws — not of kings or dictators. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am by JURIST Staff
Private nuisance is “interference” with someone’s “use or enjoyment of land that is both substantial and unreasonable” (Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v Ontario (Ministry of Transportation) 2013 SCC 13 at para 18, my underlining). [read post]