Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 40,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:01 am
On June 29, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:59 am
1 Roundabout Theatre Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
” Helpfully, DEA is asking those who plan to attend the listening sessions to consider the following questions ahead of time: If telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications were permitted in the absence of an in-person medical evaluation, what framework, including safeguards and data, with respect to telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications do you recommend to help the agency ensure patient safety and prevent diversion of controlled substances? [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am
This contribution argues that Sanchez v France takes an untenable position regarding third-party liability for content on social media. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
As IPKat readers know, it was only a couple of months ago that The IPKat celebrated its first 20 years of activity. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:29 pm
This case gives the court another bite at the apple to hold that Section 230 applies to online intermediaries that recommend content created by others, after its opinion in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
Whether the Senator is recognized would seem to be a political question under Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm
But two years later, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm
Individual interest v. public interest opposed in those cases and in Kirtsaeng. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
The idea here is as old as those expressed by Henry Ford in the Famous 1919 US case Dodge v Ford: happy, well used and paid workers make great consumers and reduce labor issues even when they can act in concert. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:04 am
The petitioner now appeals the First Circuit’s affirmance given that the jury did not find a “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud” (Lemelson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am
Fred Yen: These interface problems have existed since Lotus v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
But broadly, market based, focused on private investment, content neutral; largely hands-off except for granting ©. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Although we never learned what changes were made to the record, we were able to come to a resolution largely because the defendant medical practice did not want the inspection of the plaintiff’s EMR to occur. [read post]