Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 2141 - 2160 of 40,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by Delia A. Deschaine
” Helpfully, DEA is asking those who plan to attend the listening sessions to consider the following questions ahead of time: If telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications were permitted in the absence of an in-person medical evaluation, what framework, including safeguards and data, with respect to telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications do you recommend to help the agency ensure patient safety and prevent diversion of controlled substances? [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am by INFORRM
This contribution argues that Sanchez v France takes an untenable position regarding third-party liability for content on social media. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
As IPKat readers know, it was only a couple of months ago that The IPKat celebrated its first 20 years of activity. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am by SHG
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:29 pm by Sophia Cope
This case gives the court another bite at the apple to hold that Section 230 applies to online intermediaries that recommend content created by others, after its opinion in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm by Josh Blackman
Whether the Senator is recognized would seem to be a political question under Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Individual interest v. public interest opposed in those cases and in Kirtsaeng. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
The idea here is as old as those expressed by Henry Ford in the Famous 1919 US case Dodge v Ford: happy, well used and paid workers make great consumers and reduce labor issues even when they can act in concert. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:04 am by Unknown
The petitioner now appeals the First Circuit’s affirmance given that the jury did not find a “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud” (Lemelson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fred Yen: These interface problems have existed since Lotus v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But broadly, market based, focused on private investment, content neutral; largely hands-off except for granting ©. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Elie Maalouf
Although we never learned what changes were made to the record, we were able to come to a resolution largely because the defendant medical practice did not want the inspection of the plaintiff’s EMR to occur. [read post]