Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” In a case that came before the highest court in New York State in 1984, People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This is, of course, why Lord Denning has proven to be so enduring and popular. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by INFORRM
The approach articulated by Lord Sumption is the opposite of that stated by Proudman J at first instance: “The exception cannot have been intended to legitimise all copies made in the course of browsing or users would be permitted to watch pirated films and listen to pirated music. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by INFORRM
 It will come into force on “such day as the Secretary of State may appoint”. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
To get one, a federal agent, with (Lord help us, hopefully) a federal prosecutor assisting, drafts an affidavit explaining the facts supplying probable cause for the federal charges sought. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
To get one, a federal agent, with (Lord help us, hopefully) a federal prosecutor assisting, drafts an affidavit explaining the facts supplying probable cause for the federal charges sought. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am by Graham Smith
  In that sense the Supreme Court judgment has similarities to the Canadian Supreme Court Copyright Pentalogy and the CJEU decision in Usedsoft v Oracle.The approach articulated by Lord Sumption is the opposite of that stated by Proudman J at first instance: "The exception cannot have been intended to legitimise all copies made in the course of browsing or users would be permitted to watch pirated films and listen to pirated music." [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As Lord Henry Brougham declared and the Supreme Court of Canada embraced in R v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Francisco Macías
  Chistopher Columbus at the Royal Court of Spain, by Václav Brožik c.1884 This Easter Sunday, March 31, marks the 521st anniversary of the issuance of the Alhambra Decree. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]