Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 15,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Esparza v Nares, 2022 WL 17724414 ( S.D. Texas, 2022)
20 Dec 2022, 7:42 am
England v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
The Eleventh Circuit found that there was no evidence that one appellant, Lowe, took any action in furtherance of one of the robberies. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
Both strategies improved achievement for low-income students, but integration produced larger achievement gains and at a lower cost. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:09 pm
Troyer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:28 pm
The Appellate Division, First Department's recent decision in Rose v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
It alleges, among other things, that Bishop unlawfully retained documents relating to the national defense; and further that he disclosed classified information to his girlfriend, including: “existing war plans, information regarding nuclear weapons, and relations with international partners” (classified at SECRET) “planned deployment of U.S. strategic nuclear systems, as well as the ability of the U.S. to detect low and medium range ballistic missiles of foreign… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
I understand the need to keep costs low. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
Factual information of that kind may sometimes involve a relatively low degree of intrusion. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
Myth #1: King v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 5:51 am
Additional Resources: Newton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
–Martell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
Given the adverse precedent that’s recently accumulated (plus the low-quality lawyering in Trump’s cases), there is no doubt that Trump’s claims will fail should they reach a Ninth Circuit ruling on the merits. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Thomas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:02 am
There’s no evidence that this proposed ban has gone anywhere, and officials with United Launch Alliance (ULA), which builds the Atlas V, sound unconcerned. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:24 am
Passages in the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Code of Practice (2011) provided helpful guidance as to the relatively low threshold of disadvantage (“unfavourable treatment”) sufficient to trigger the requirement to justify the treatment as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, under the Equality Act 2010, s 15(1). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
Which -- let's be honest -- is one of the principal reasons you took the (low paying) job in the first plance, right? [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:07 pm
The case involved a low speed auto accident. [read post]
