Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 2141 - 2160 of 42,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
Lay witnesses are subject to the numerous objections provided by the rules of evidence to keep out opinion, conclusive answers, speculation and other matters they did not, personally, experience. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:15 pm by Adam Kielich
Requests for admission answered in the affirmative can be used in trial and summary judgment as evidence. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 10:11 am by Vishnu S
Related posts:Role of An Expert and an Eye-witness in the Law of Evidence Author : J Bishen Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, which provides for admissibility of opinions of experts on certain matters, poses an exception to the general rule of...... [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   In this matter, the court found that the Plaintiff had no evidence as to the cause or origin of the spilled liquid. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Pa.In this matter, Judge Mariani denied the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the production of financial evidence as the motion was found to be untimely under the discovery schedule previously set by the court. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 pm
The appellants of a probate case have filed for an objection against the original ruling of probate by the court. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:37 am by Andrew Trask
… Going forward, the clear directive to plaintiffs seeking class certification--in any type of case--is that they will face a rigorous analysis by the federal courts, will not be afforded favorable presumptions from the pleadings or otherwise and must be prepared to prove with facts--and by a preponderance of the evidence--their compliance with the requirements of Rule 23. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:29 pm by azatty
He said that these elected lawyers are different, and not required to abide by rules, for example, that they “cannot represent a client on one matter and be opposed to him in another. [read post]
In the December 28th ruling, the Secretary of State stated that the Congressional January 6th report qualifies as evidence that reasonable persons can rely on in deciding “severe matters before the court”. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Plaintiff asserted that the jury's verdict of $0 bore no rational relationship to the evidence produced at trial, and defied common sense and was shocking.The court noted that liability was admitted in this rear end accident matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:34 am
” The rule is even stricter than this wording suggests, for the exception proves to be the rule, as the Valerie W. opinion makes clear: The court in Zeth S. set forth the general rule that: ” ‘[A]n appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition, upon a record of matters which were before the trial court for its consideration. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 11:21 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that statistical evidence of racial bias could not be considered in individual cases, but that states could pass their own legislation to do so. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
As Helen previously wrote, recusal enforcement is primarily a matter of political pressure and not actual rules or law. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
Wilkens appealed asserting: (1) the trial court erred in not finding, as a matter of law, that Colliers Pinkard was in a dual agency with Wilkens and CMC; (2) the trial court erred by not ruling, as a matter of law, that Colliers Pinkard's relationship with CMC was a material fact that Colliers Pinkard had a duty to disclose; and (3) that the trial court erred by not giving requested jury instructions.Analysis: A real estate broker stands in a fiduciary relationship… [read post]