Search for: "Matthews v. Matthews" Results 2141 - 2160 of 5,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 6:31 am
Filed: November 27, 2018Opinion by: Judge Matthew FaderHolding: Although there is evidence from which a trial court could infer damages from expert testimony with reasonable certainty despite a plaintiff's failure to offer such proof, it is not required to draw such inferences as it is the plaintiff's burden to carry.Facts:  The defendants in this suit were two holders of preferred stock (the "Stockholders") of Telos Corporation ("Telos"). [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
 - Matthew DickPositec v Husqvarna [2016] EWHC 1061A Patents Court judge named BirssSaid obviousness disclosure’s a curse:Inventors’ thoughts on prior artJust ain’t worth a fart,So directions to disclose ‘em I’ll reverse. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 24 September 2016 Ms Middleton and her fiancé James Matthews were granted an urgent injunction in the High Court by Mr Justice Dove preventing publication of photographs stolen from her iCloud account. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week, the ONCA released their decision in Westover Estate v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 11:26 am by nipper
Matthew Buchanan and Stephen Nipper. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 21, 2023 in the international trademark case of Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:05 am by dbladmin
Conley, 456 S.W.3d 814 (Ky. 2015), the Court, in an opinion by Justice Lisabeth Abramson, overruled by name one prior opinion of the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Matthews v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Fairfield County as well as public university due process case of Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
Matthews, 591 F.3d 230, 235 n.7 (4th Cir. 2009) (noting that an officer’s suspicion that contraband may be present in the vehicle does not invalidate an otherwise lawful inventory search); United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:21 am by autumn
~At Matthews Law Firm, P.A., we practice criminal defense and health law [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am by INFORRM
As previously discussed by Matthew Hill, in JXF Tugendhat J had sought to limit the ambit of his decision to grant an anonymity order and to ensure that courts considered anonymity applications carefully and methodically. [read post]