Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 12:37 pm
Power creates its own reality to which others must respond. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:43 am
Or so says my friend V Venkatesan while disagreeing with my explanation of how the cabinet is carrying on despite the Prime Minister's temporary absence. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:12 pm
” That prompted a Board Meeting where: Attorney Sonnenfeld discussed the Demand Letter, corresponding ALI Principles, and the duty of care owed by the board to respond to the Demand Letter. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:00 am
  I guarantee he'll respond before you have a chance to entertain any second thoughts. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs… [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
We reverse and remand with instructions. * * * We conclude that Davis is owed commissions that he earned before leaving All American. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
Respondent explained that when Margaret confronted him as he was attempting to remove the Owings' stereo, he stabbed her in the stomach with a knife he was carrying. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]