Search for: "PHILLIPS v. STATE"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 9:58 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Rosendahl v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Knockoff Oscars: 2008 Plagiarius awards announcedNo touch of mink: TTAB rules that "Mink" is misdescriptive for synthetic shoesOne ring to rule them both: PA court rules c.z. engagement ring didn't invalidate prenupBrutta figura: Fakes, immigrant sweatshop labor cheapen "Made in Italy" labelItalianate… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
The case is Ledet v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:45 am
FBL – from Iowa Employer Law Blog Employers must be prepared for GINA claims – from Jennifer Hays at the Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog Family Responsibility Discrimination – from Stephanie Thomas’s The Proactive Employer Meeting your ADA requirements starts with a simple chat – from Stephen Meyer’s HR Cafe Inability to get along with co-workers can be sufficient basis for adverse employment action – from… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
That last point, the runaway jury awarding punitive damages on its own volition, particularly troubles us, because in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Law Offices of Phillip J. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The Court held, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
According to the indictment, in late November 2010, WikiLeaks released a large amount of classified United States State Department cables on its website. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:53 am
., State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The culture wars have embraced the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:48 am
Ganci v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
But Art.1 states only Congress can borrow. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This is because the two opposing experts are going have to testify about the state of knowledge of the person skilled in the art with regard to Baldwin's Rules for ring closure. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
and the speakers are the all-too-infrequent IP Finance blogger Anne Fairpo (13 Old Square) and Kevin Phillips (no relation to this blogger) of Baker Tilly. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on an older California Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]