Search for: "People v. Bounds" Results 2141 - 2160 of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
  Well, remember when you look around the room during your first class, the people who are really dumb are the ones who lick envelopes at the party headquarters for a decade and later become the judges. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm by Mark Walsh
It is not, formally or informally, bound by the weather decisions made for the executive branch by the Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
12 Feb 2006, 2:32 pm
Music downloaded for free from the Internet is a close substitute for purchased music; many people are bound to keep the downloaded files without buying originals. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
O'Brien, No. 072312 In a conviction for charges related to attempted robbery, conspiracy to affect interstate commerce, and carrying a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, ruling that machine-gun possession was an element of a crime rather than a sentencing enhancement is affirmed where absent a clearer or more dramatic change in language or legislative history expressing a specific intent to assign judge or jury functions, court is bound by Supreme Court decision, Castillo… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lynch, 15-362, is for all you CAT People out there. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Alcede, like many small business owners, closely associated his own identity with that of his business, so closely that he entitled the Facebook Page “Tactical Firearms” “for people to know it was me. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
  He lost, after the majority held that they’re bound by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Babbitt v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
By way of perspective, several early 1800s American cases (I know of four published opinions, Ruggles, Updegraph, Kneeland, and Murray) upheld convictions for blasphemy of Christianity, sometimes based on similar facts: People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:56 am
  So he was glad to read the judgment of the England and Wales Court of Appeal, right at the end of term, in Woolley & anor v. [read post]